Answer:
pros: protection from law suits, accusations, police officers randomly showing up at your house and asking bs
cons: could allow officials to get away with things, many say it's injust, officers can get sued/reported
Rule of Law: Criminal Law
Facts 1: Sophie is the president of Tasty Foods Corporation, a wholesale grocery company. An inspection by Uri, a government agent, uncovers unsanitary conditions caused by Vic, a Tasty Foods employee, in the company’s warehouse. Will, a Tasty Foods vice president, assures Uri that the situation will be corrected, but a later inspection reveals no such corrections. Sophie knows nothing about any of this.
Issue: Can Tasty Foods be convicted of a crime in these circumstances? Define, explain, and decide
Issue: Can Sophie be held personally liable? Define, explain and decide
Facts 2: Fred, a successful stockbroker, gives a lecture about investing. Some of the persons who attend the lecture form Gain & Profit, an investment club, and ask Fred to advise them. Gain & Profit allows Fred to set up an account for the club with a brokerage firm and gives Fred control of the account, but does not authorize Fred to withdraw funds for his own benefit. Fred uses the money in the Gain & Profit account to repay personal loans. Charged with embezzlement, Fred defends his actions on the ground that he intended to repay the club.
Issue: Is Fred guilty of embezzlement? Why or why not? Define, explain and decide.
Answer:
The answer to both questions is yes.
Explanation:
A corporation may be held liable for the crime of its employee if (1) the criminal act is within the scope of the employment and the purpose of the statute defining the act as a crime is to impose liability on the corporation, (2) the crime consists of a failure to perform a specific duty imposed on corporations by law, and (3) the crime was authorized by one of the corporation's "high managerial agents." Here, all of these elements exist. The unsanitary conditions in the warehouse are within the employee's scope of employment, the crime consists of a failure to keep the warehouse clean, and the crime was authorized by a company vice president. As for the president's personal liability, if she has the authority and the responsibility to deal with the situation, she can be held personally liable. A corporate officer must have the authority and the responsibility to deal with such situations. Personal liability is imposed in these circumstances, not because the corporate officer knew about the crime or intended it, but because the officer is in a "responsible relationship" to the corporation and has the power to prevent the crime. Under this "responsible corporate officer" doctrine, a corporate officer can be held liable for an employee's violations of the law. This liability may be imposed regardless of whether the officer participated in, directed, or knew about the violation.
Do you think that the dairy industry is an example of a purely competitive market? Why or why not? If not, what industry is?
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
because it record everything
Law in Society
who participates in negotiations?
a. parties or attorneys
b. arbitrators and attorneys
c. only the parties
d. mediator and parties
Answer:
option d makes sense to this question
Explain accident as an exempting circumstance. Give an example.
Answer:
EXEMPTING CIRCUMSTANCE • Accident presupposes lack of intention to commit wrong done. (refers to purely accidental case)--person performing a lawful act must do so with DUE CARE, WITHOUT FAULT OR NEGLIGENT. V. UNDER THE COMPULSION OF IRRESISTIBLE FORCE • ELEMENTS: 1.
Which factor would Anti-Federalists most strongly support?
Answer:
Anti-Federalist strongly support the idea of stric Constitution witch means that whatever is not in the constitution is not going to be a law.
What is a “hung jury?”
Answer:
When there are insufficient jurors voting one way or the other to deliver either a guilty or not guilty verdict, the jury is known as a “hung jury” or it might be said that jurors are “deadlocked”. The judge may direct them to deliberate further, usually no more than once or twice.
the rule of law and the one way it influenced the creation of the U.S. government.
The rule of law is the restriction of the arbitrary exercise of power by subordinating it to well-defined and established laws. It is the authority and influence of law in society, especially when viewed as a constraint on individual and institutional behavior. The rule of law influenced the creation of the US government because it created a framework for American government, establishing three separate branches so that each branch would be independent and balanced among the others. These branches were the legislative, judicial, and executive. The legislative branch of government contains the parliament - the body with the legislative power to make laws, the judicial branch is in charge of deciding the meaning of laws, how to apply them to real situations, and whether a law breaks the rules of the Constitution, and the executive branch carries out and enforces laws.
How was the Vietnamese Legal system formed
Answer: The Democratic Republic of Vietnam was established following the August Revolution of 1945. A new legal system was gradually formed alongside the government in order to strengthen the government and social management. The reality of the legal system is secured and brought into play on this basis.
Explanation: Hope that helps
Larry is told by Moe that Curly stole his prized business law book from his car. The next day Larry confronts Curly and slaps him repeatedly for stealing his book. Curly had Larry arrested for slapping him. Larry sues Curly for damages in the amount of the book and for maliciously having him arrested. Claiming that he lied, Curly sues Moe for defamation. The lawsuit Larry has against Curly for damages for stealing his book involves which of the following?
a. Public law.
b. Private law.
c. Administrative law.
d. Both public and private law.
Answer:
i think its D
Explanation:
Both public and private law as the lawsuit Larry has against Curly for damages for stealing his book. Hence, option D is correct.
What is lawsuit?A lawsuit is a civil legal proceeding in which one party files a claim against another the defendant, and the court makes the final decision.
Depending on the remedy sought and the jurisdiction where the plaintiff filed the complaint, a lawsuit filed in court to seek relief from or a remedy for a claimed injury may be tried by a court of law or a court of equity.
A lawsuit typically involves issues like breach of contract, financial difficulties, bodily harm, or property damage. The purpose of a lawsuit is for the plaintiff to demand that the defendant make amends for the wrongdoing or pay damages.
Thus, option D is correct.
For more details about lawsuit, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15028192
#SPJ2
How many points on a fingerprint do forensic scientists require when making a match for identification purposes?
8 to 16
4 to 7
30 to 35
60 to 65
Answer:
I think it's 8 to 16
Explanation:
Some experts will declare a match based on only 12 points in common, whereas other experts may require up to 20 points in common before declaring a match. So it's hard to be certain
About 8-16 fingerprints are required by forensic scientists while making a match for identification purposes in the Forensics report. Hence, option A is appropriate.
What do you mean by Forensic?Forensics is the science of understanding criminology and also helps in the collection process of evidence and criminalistic things. Forensic science has also been used with the help of knowing the civic laws in a better way.
Forensics helps in knowing the crime scene so well by collecting all the traces from the crime scene, which will help them in the process of understanding the crime and also how the crime has been committed.
There are various departments within the Forensics department. The department of Forensics works closely with the police or the crime branch. Hence, option A is correct.
Learn more about Forensics here:
https://brainly.com/question/14403044
#SPJ2
Why are prosecutors and defense attorneys seen as legal adversaries?
The defense and the prosecution are not seen as legal adversaries.
The defense attorney is responsible for arguing against the police’s procedural steps used to charge their client.
The prosecutor and the defense attorney are both responsible for arguing against the judge’s case.
The prosecutor is responsible for presenting the state’s evidence against the accused, and the defense attorney is responsible for arguing against the state’s case.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
The prosecutor is responsible for presenting the state's evidence against the accused, and the defense attorney is responsible for arguing against the state's case
Homicide makes up % of all crimes known to law enforcement.
Answer:
75%
Explanation:
g
What does it mean to “establish the principle”?
Answer: establish a principle (=make it accepted)Establish the principle that when your office door is shut you must not be disturbed. lay down a principle (=describe a principle and make it accepted)The report lays down general principles for the teaching of English.
Does the risk of substance use resulting from time spent engaged in unstructured socializing with peers begin immediately, or is a certain minimum threshold of time spent with peers required?
Answer:
minimum required amount of time spent engaging in unstructured socializing with peers to pose a risk of alcohol or marijuana use is 3 to 5 hr per week.
Explanation:
What form of restitution is used to repay society as a whole?
to answer the question.
Answer:
Where's the question?........
The incidence of domestic homicide has fallen nationally over the past 25 years.
O True
False

Answer:
Explanation:
False
Which source would be the MOST biased when it comes to evaluating the current American presidency, compared to past presidents?
Some of the sources that can be biassed when it comes to evaluating the current American presidency compared to past presidents include current executive members
Other biased sources include the following:
Political party members of the President,Previous schools the current President attended,Family of the current President The political party the President belonged to,The special assistants to the current President, etc.
The sources that would be biased when evaluating the current American presidency compared to past presidents are those closest to the President or in support of the incumbent President.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that many sources supporting the current President will be biased towards his cause.
Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/20646239
do police officers discriminate against minorities
11. Although he knew he was guilty of the crime, the mobster said he wouldn't answer questions
about it on the stand. Which amendment protected him?
a. 4th amendment
b. 5th amendment
6th amendment
d. 7th amendment
Answer:
5th amendment
Explanation:
The 5th amendment goes as follows "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."
Answer:
5th
Explanation:
"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger..."
5th Amedment, U.S Constitution
Bacically the constitution allows you to not answer the police officer if he asks you what happened, it is similar to Meranda Rights
please reword this thesis into an conclusion
While Letting them vote will be extremely educational for them, people under eighteen would make a difference, and it'd be a good idea to allow them to state their opinion and vote because they will increase the voter turnout, they have a better knowledge in their community than adults, and if they're given the choice to vote it'll greatly affect everything.
Do you have to carry evidence of insurance whenever you drive. True or False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Ik
Name the two most prevalent perspectives of the role of the Criminal Justice System.
Answer:
There are six perspectives of justice; Crime Control Perspective, Rehabilitation Perspective, Due Process Perspective, Nonintervention Perspective, Equal Justice Perspective, and Restoration Perspective. The Due Process Perspective is the most ideal justice perspective that has been implemented over time.
Explanation:
What are the four steps, in order, of active crime response
Answer:
Introduce yourself to victims by name and title. Briefly explain your role and purpose.
Reassure victims of their safety and your concern by paying close attention to your own words, posture, mannerisms, and tone of voice. Say to victims, “You're safe now” or “I'm here now.” Use body language to show concern, such as nodding your head, using natural eye contact, placing yourself at the victim's level rather than standing over seated victims, keeping an open stance rather than crossing your arms, and speaking in a calm, sympathetic voice.
Ask victims to tell you in just a sentence or two what happened. Ask if they have any physical injuries. Take care of their medical needs first.
Offer to contact a family member, friend, or crisis counselor for victims.
Ensure privacy during your interview. Conduct it in a place where victims feel secure.
Ask simple questions that allow victims to make decisions, assert themselves, and regain control over their lives. Examples: “Would you like anything to drink?”; “May I come inside and talk with you?”; and “How would you like me to address you, Ms. Jones?”
Assure victims of the confidentiality of their comments whenever possible.
Ask victims about any special concerns or needs they may have.
Provide a “safety net” for victims before leaving them. Make telephone calls and pull together personal or professional support for the victims. Give victims a pamphlet listing resources available for help or information. This pamphlet should include contact information for local crisis intervention centers and support groups; the prosecutor's office and the victim-witness assistance office; the State victim compensation/assistance office; and other nationwide services, including toll-free hotlines.
Give victim's—in writing—your name and information on how to reach you. Encourage them to contact you if they have any questions or if you can be of further help.
Explanation:
Which of the following individuals may be required to undergo HIV testing? a) Employees of a small business with limited health insurance resources b) A technician at an HIV testing lab c) A convicted sex offender d) A nurse applying for a job at a hospital
A convicted sex offender
Family killings are most likely to occur in which type of location?
O a. Large cities
O b. Small cities
O c. Rural
O d. Suburban
O c. Rural areas, mostly bcos if poverty
To establish the crime of murder, the corpus delicti must be presented with a confession?
PLEASE HELP ASAP
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Corpus delicti; referring to the principle that a crime must be proved to have occurred before a person can be convicted of committing that crime.
This theory proclaims that criminals must be taught both practical and emotional skills necessary to participate in illegal activities
Answer:
The Learning Theory
Explanation:
The learning theory proclaims that criminals must be taught both practical and emotional skills necessary to participate in illegal activities.
Chế độ thai sản trong luật
1. Lao động nữ sinh con được nghỉ việc hưởng chế độ thai sản trước và sau khi sinh con là 06 tháng. Trường hợp lao động nữ sinh đôi trở lên thì tính từ con thứ hai trở đi, cứ mỗi con, người mẹ được nghỉ thêm 01 tháng. Thời gian nghỉ hưởng chế độ thai sản trước khi sinh tối đa không quá 02 tháng.
What evidence demonstrates that Canada has succeeded in fostering
multicultural acceptance?
Answer:
In Canada there are many examples of multiculturalism. For example, Canada lets in refugees and immigrants and does not care about their race, religion, or culture.
