A convicted sex offender
David is a wealthy business owner with no children and is very close with his only niece, Allie. He would like to give her a
large gift for her 18th birthday as a token of his affection for her. After much consideration, he finally decides to buy her a
brand new Corvette convertible. To deliver the gift, David puts the convertible keys on a keychain and hides them in her
coat pocket. He then tells her that her gift is in her coat pocket and the car is hers immediately. She finds the keys and is
delighted. Allie's parents, however, are hardworking and proud and as such, they are hesitant to allow her to accept the
gift. After much pressure from her parents, Allie decides not to accept the gift from her uncle because she does not want
to feel obligated to him. She would feel more comfortable with a less expensive birthday present.
Go through the requirements that a gift must have to be valid. Does the Corvette in question qualify as a gift?
How many elements are necessary for this type of gift to be valid?
The requirements that a gift must have to be valid are intention, delivery, and acceptance. The Corvette does not qualify as a gift because it was not accepted and for a gift to be valid all three elements (intention, delivery, and acceptance) are required
When we are going to give a gift to another person, there must be three basic elements so that it can be considered as a gift. Those elements are:
Intention: Refers to the intention of an individual to give another individual an object as a token of affectionDelivery: It refers to the act of officially delivering a said object to the other personReceipt: It refers to the act of receiving and thanking said gift and assuming it as one's ownAccording to the above, in the situation presented, the Corvette cannot be considered as a gift because there is the intention and the delivery but not the reception, that is, Allie does not assume that Corvette is hers.
On the other hand, for a gift to be considered as a gift, the three elements must be present because if a person does not have the initiative if an official delivery is not made, and if it is not received and assumed as their own, the gift can not be considered as a gift.
Learn more in: https://brainly.com/question/22065860
Explain the premise of unstructured socializing with peers and it's link to antisocial behavior and substance use among adolescents?
Answer:
Juvenile delinquency refers to antisocial or illegal behavior by children or adolescents.
Explanation:
4. What are the pros and cons of immunity?
Answer:
pros: protection from law suits, accusations, police officers randomly showing up at your house and asking bs
cons: could allow officials to get away with things, many say it's injust, officers can get sued/reported
7. When an officer has a reasonable basis for the belief that a person should be searched or
arrested, it is called
A a warrant
B an affidavit
C probable cause
D search and seize.
Answer:
C. PROBABLE CAUSE
Explanation:
Probable cause exists when an officer has a reasonable basis for the belief that a person should be searched or arrested.
Each ____
has its own agency that is responsible for determining and enforcing the licensing laws and regulations for social workers in that area
Answer:
peopleノ(・ω・)ノノ(・ω・)ノノ(・ω・)ノノ(・ω・)ノノ(・ω・)ノ
Answer:
state
Explanation:
How much should intent matter in determining the seriousness of a crime? Should an attempted larceny carry a shorter sentence than a completed theft? Should attempted murder carry a shorter sentence than a completed murder? Explain your answer.
The intent of the perpetrator is often considered an important factor in determining the seriousness of a crime and the appropriate sentence. However, the extent to which intent should be taken into account can be a complex and nuanced issue.
What is the seriousness of a crime?In general, the more premeditated and intentional a crime is, the more serious it is considered to be. For example, attempted murder may be considered less serious than completed murder, because the perpetrator did not succeed in taking a life.
However, it's important to note that attempted crimes can still have severe consequences and can cause significant harm to the victim. For example, an attempted murder can still cause serious physical injuries to the victim, and an attempted larceny can still cause fear, anxiety and financial loss for the victim.
Therefore, it's important that the intent of the perpetrator be weighed alongside the actual harm caused to the victim in determining the seriousness of the crime and the appropriate sentence.
Learn more about crime from
https://brainly.com/question/6203610
#SPJ1
Texas law also requires children of certain ages, weights and heights to
Answer:
Texas law requires all children younger than 8 years old, unless taller than 4'9”, to be in the appropriate child safety seat system.
Texas law requires all children younger than 8 years old, unless taller than 4'9”, to be in the appropriate child safety seat system.
What is a law?In order to control conduct, social or political institutions make laws that are then enforced. However, the exact concept of law is still up for question. It has been called both science and the practice of justice in diverse contexts. There are two realms that make up the application of the law. Public law, which includes criminal law, administrative law,
In accordance with Texas law, all children under the age of eight must sit in a child safety seat unless they are taller than 4 feet 9 inches. Older kids who have outgrown a booster seat need to be belted in.
Therefore, By the law, it requires a child safety seat whenever they ride in a vehicle.
Learn more about the law here:
https://brainly.com/question/6590381
#SPJ2
power steering will be affected if your engine stalls true or false
Answer:
True
Explanation:
If the engine stalls and the car loses all of its power the brakes may also stop working and so does the power steering.
Under constitutional law, does the President have the legal authority to mandate anything on the citizens in our country?
Rule of Law: Criminal Law
Facts 1: Sophie is the president of Tasty Foods Corporation, a wholesale grocery company. An inspection by Uri, a government agent, uncovers unsanitary conditions caused by Vic, a Tasty Foods employee, in the company’s warehouse. Will, a Tasty Foods vice president, assures Uri that the situation will be corrected, but a later inspection reveals no such corrections. Sophie knows nothing about any of this.
Issue: Can Tasty Foods be convicted of a crime in these circumstances? Define, explain, and decide
Issue: Can Sophie be held personally liable? Define, explain and decide
Facts 2: Fred, a successful stockbroker, gives a lecture about investing. Some of the persons who attend the lecture form Gain & Profit, an investment club, and ask Fred to advise them. Gain & Profit allows Fred to set up an account for the club with a brokerage firm and gives Fred control of the account, but does not authorize Fred to withdraw funds for his own benefit. Fred uses the money in the Gain & Profit account to repay personal loans. Charged with embezzlement, Fred defends his actions on the ground that he intended to repay the club.
Issue: Is Fred guilty of embezzlement? Why or why not? Define, explain and decide.
Answer:
The answer to both questions is yes.
Explanation:
A corporation may be held liable for the crime of its employee if (1) the criminal act is within the scope of the employment and the purpose of the statute defining the act as a crime is to impose liability on the corporation, (2) the crime consists of a failure to perform a specific duty imposed on corporations by law, and (3) the crime was authorized by one of the corporation's "high managerial agents." Here, all of these elements exist. The unsanitary conditions in the warehouse are within the employee's scope of employment, the crime consists of a failure to keep the warehouse clean, and the crime was authorized by a company vice president. As for the president's personal liability, if she has the authority and the responsibility to deal with the situation, she can be held personally liable. A corporate officer must have the authority and the responsibility to deal with such situations. Personal liability is imposed in these circumstances, not because the corporate officer knew about the crime or intended it, but because the officer is in a "responsible relationship" to the corporation and has the power to prevent the crime. Under this "responsible corporate officer" doctrine, a corporate officer can be held liable for an employee's violations of the law. This liability may be imposed regardless of whether the officer participated in, directed, or knew about the violation.
In your opinion, do you think that the different degrees of a crime should have different punishments? Or do you think there should be just one established punishment for a crime, no matter what the degree? Explain your answer.
Answer:
different degrees of crimes should have different punishment
Explanation:
This is because some crimes attract harder punishment than others
When making ethical decisions on behalf of your employer, should you consider the impact on others outside your employer? If so, who and why?
Please help me
In a situation in which I have to make ethical decisions on behalf of my employer, I should consider the impact of the people who are involved because my ethical behavior would be involved despite being on behalf of my employer.
Ethics is a term to refer to a subdiscipline of philosophy that focuses on the study of human behavior, its relationship with:
The notions of right and wrongThe moral preceptsDutyThe happinessThe common welfareAccording to the above, in a situation in which I must make an ethical decision on behalf of my boss, I must consider the impact that it will have on other people because my ethical actions will influence my decision. For example:
If my boss tells me that I should fire a co-worker because the company has lowered its profits, surely he considers that this is an ethical act for his benefit and his interests.However, I know that my partner depends on the salary he earns in the company and that he and his family would be affected by this decision. Then I could not fire him because he would be doing him a bad thing.Learn more in: https://brainly.com/question/2630782
why is Uhuru Kenyatta in pandora papers
Answer:
The father of the Uhuru Kenyatta was Jomo Kenyatta.
Explanation:
What do the layers in this sedimentary rock reveal?sedimentary rock showing lines of different colored rock formed over time
Answer: How the landscape changed over time
Workplace murders are most commonly committed by offenders in which age group? O a . Under 18 O b . 18-24 O c . 25-34 O d 35-49
Answer:
C 25-34
Explanation:
Chế độ thai sản trong luật
1. Lao động nữ sinh con được nghỉ việc hưởng chế độ thai sản trước và sau khi sinh con là 06 tháng. Trường hợp lao động nữ sinh đôi trở lên thì tính từ con thứ hai trở đi, cứ mỗi con, người mẹ được nghỉ thêm 01 tháng. Thời gian nghỉ hưởng chế độ thai sản trước khi sinh tối đa không quá 02 tháng.
What are the potential negative consequences of having a nation full of citizens who are uninformed and/or apathetic voters?
Which of the following individuals may be required to undergo HIV testing? a) Employees of a small business with limited health insurance resources b) A technician at an HIV testing lab c) A convicted sex offender d) A nurse applying for a job at a hospital
Answer:
The answer is B because they are exposed to HIV all the time.
Explanation:
6.
Class B fires use the following as fuel:
a.
wood, paper and cloth.
Ο Ο Ο
b.
magnesium, sodium and zinc.
o close
C.
grease, gas and oily
up
Answer:
option a is the correct option
The authority to make decisions in enforcing the law based on one's observations and judgment
rather than the letter of the law is referred to as which of the following?
Answer:
Explanation;:
Which attorney must maintain confidentiality and advise their client of the constitutional requirements of counsel, the privilege against self-incrimination, and the right to trial?
Prosecutor
Grand jury
Mediator
Defense
Answer:
Defense
Explanation:
The sole representative of the accused.
How does the 4th Amendment protect the American public in 3 to 4 sentences
Answer:
The Constitution, through the Fourth Amendment, protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. The Fourth Amendment, however, is not a guarantee against all searches and seizures, but only those that are deemed unreasonable under the law.
Explanation:
When the defense and the prosecution work together in a spirit of cooperation to get the case over with rather than fighting it out, this is known as what?
The rule of four
The formal justice system
Community prosecution
The informal justice system
Answer:
community prosecution
Anita runs a business supplying furniture for special events. She has a contract to provide 100 chairs for Bob's 60thbirthday garden party, for $500. On the morning of the party, Bob and his helpers are setting up for the day's celebrations. Anita arrives, but she has only brought 93 chairs. She first speaks to Bob's nephew, Jasper. When he hears that only 93 chairs have arrived, Jasper quickly gets into his car to go find another furniture hire business. He finds one that will provide 7 similar chairs, for a cost of $63. When Anita sees Bob inside, and tells him she has only brought 93 chairs, Bob is angry. Anita claims that Bob must pay her the full $500, but Bob disagrees. Is Anita entitled to any payment (and if so, how much)?
Answer:
She is entitled to a pro-rated payment of $465.00
Explanation:
You would take the $500 and divide it by the 100 chairs. That is $5 a chair. Then multiply $5 x 93. That is $465.
Do you have to carry evidence of insurance whenever you drive. True or False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Ik
Which factor would Anti-Federalists most strongly support?
Answer:
Anti-Federalist strongly support the idea of stric Constitution witch means that whatever is not in the constitution is not going to be a law.
What legal concept gives the Supreme Court power to influence and mold the everyday operating procedures of the police, trial courts, and corrections agencies?
1.) Pro bono
2.) Implicit bias
3.) Mediation
4.) Precedent
If you were driving the blue Prius in the situation pictured above, explain why the red Mustang should be given right-of-way at this
intersection.
Your answer should be → I have to yield to the red mustang because it is on my right.
Law in Society
who participates in negotiations?
a. parties or attorneys
b. arbitrators and attorneys
c. only the parties
d. mediator and parties
Answer:
option d makes sense to this question
to answer the question.
Answer:
Where's the question?........
