After the American Revolution, early state constitutions allowed for which principle that can also be found in the US.
Constitution?
A)
Suffrage for all
B)
Centralized power
9
Checks and Balances
D)
Totalitarian government
Which of these is the BEST definition of power?
-0)
A)
the feeling that one is more important than others
B)
the ability to influence people to do things
C) the right to tell others what to do
D) the tendency to lead

Answer:

Hiiiiiii!!! :)))

Explanation:

How are you?

Answer:

hiiiiii  hru wyd

Explanation:

From the chart, we can see that from 1972 onwards, women were more likely to support democratic candidates than men.

The chart shows that since 1972, women have increasingly voted for the Democratic party and even though their support fluctuates, it still remains quite high such that over 50% of women have voted for the Democrats since 1996.

The most probable reason for this is that:

Men on the other hand, have maintained a general level of support for the Democrats but less than 50% of men have voted Democrat since 1972.

In conclusion, the chart shows that since 1972, women were more likely to vote Democrat than men would.

Find out more at https://brainly.com/question/1168260.

Answer:

D

Explanation:

edg 2022

Answer:The Law of Conservation of Mass dates from Antoine Lavoisier's 1789 discovery that mass is neither created nor destroyed in chemical reactions.

Answer: The Law of Conservation of Mass dates from Antoine Lavoisier's 1789 discovery that mass is neither created nor destroyed in chemical reactions. ... If we account for all reactants and products in a chemical reaction, the total mass will be the same at any point in time in any closed system.

A) what is the law of conservation of mass?

Law of conservation of mass:

According to the law of conservation mass, mass can neither be created nor destroyed in a chemical equation it changed from one to another form.

B) what is an every day example of the law of conservation of mass?

Burning of wood:

When wood is burn it converted into ashes, soot and gases. The mass of all these are equal to the mass of reactants i.e, oxygen and charcoal.

C) how do we see the law of conservation of mass everyday?

Burning of candle:

When candle is burn the mass of wax and oxygen is equal to the product which are carbon dioxide and water. Thus burning of candle also follow the law of conservation of mass.

Burning of wood:

When wood is burn it converted into ashes, soot and gases. The mass of all these are equal to the mass of reactants i.e, oxygen and charcoal.

D) who proposed the theory of the law of conservation of mass?

This law was given by french chemist  Antoine Lavoisier in 1789. According to this law mass of reactant and mass of product must be equal, because masses are not created or destroyed in a chemical reaction.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation: midwest

[tex]▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ { \huge \mathfrak{Answer}}▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ [/tex]

The Correct choice is :

The continental crust is the coolest region.

Documenting what changes have been made to a program and what changes are needed

Answer:

7.0 is crazy magnitude.

When there is the liquidation of fixed assets that are of use-value with cash collection, the accounts recorded are as follows C. Increase income, reduce costs.

Thus, the difference is an increase in income (profit) if the credit side exceeds the debit side of the "Sale of Fixed Assets" account.

Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/21143131

Answer:

47

Explanation:

Answer:

Your answer is A.

Explanation:

Entropy - the measure of a system's thermal energy per unit temperature that is unavailable for doing useful work

the amount of entropy is also a measure of the molecular disorder, or randomness, of a system

a thermodynamic quantity representing the unavailability of a system's thermal energy for conversion into mechanical work, often interpreted as the degree of disorder or randomness in the system

Answer:

The Athenian state was actually a direct democracy while the US is a representative democracy. Citizens are allowed to vote in both states, and both also have a bicameral legislature.

hope it helps

mark me brainliest pls

Answer:

whyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

Answer:

independence, Privacy, Equality, Achievement, Timeliness

Explanation:

Correct Me if I'm wrong, Hope this helps! :)

Answer:

C.mountain building, volcanoes, and rift zones

Explanation:

None of these things are causes of effects

Answer:

Mexico City is the answer

Answer:

New regionalism gave rise to regional organizations that had a wide-ranging set of stated policy objectives. ... Unlike old regionalism, which was oriented more toward interactions between states, new regionalism involved a variety of state and nonstate actors involved in a process of transformation of the world order.

Explanation:

Answer:

a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".

Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.

While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.

b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.

 In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.

In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.

Answer: A.) Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act. While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings. Its goal is to impose significantly more constitutional limitations on the states than existed prior to the Civil War. Therefore, the Supreme Court ruled in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), that racial redistricting must be subject to strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause and that the bodies responsible for redistricting must be aware of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act. While the Supreme Court found that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in defining the 1997 borders was based on patently false conclusions in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001).

B.) Easley filed an appeal with the US Supreme Court in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, challenging the ruling in Hunt v. Cromartie. In the case of Hunt v. Cromartie, the court determined that the North Carolina legislature did not consider race when establishing the borders of the twelfth congressional district in 1992. The court ruled that there was no proof that the legislature had violated the equal protection article of the constitution or that it had drawn boundaries based on race rather than politics. In Easley v Cromartie the argument was that establishing the borders for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The United States Supreme Court ruled that the lower court's ruling was incorrect because it genuinely relied on racial issues, which is against the interests of the state. In Shaw v. Reno, the court found that North Carolina's voting strategy attempted to separate voters based on race.

c.) I think that a move that members of this court would disagree with the BLM (Black lives Matter) movement. This case, Easley v Cromartie has severe relations to the equal protection clause. This clause states, "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." This clause when then debunked when later furthering the case, which is almost exactly what the BLM movement was about. Both cases disagreed with the equality of particular groups of people. 

Explanation: just submitted

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

they have been in war for years trying to claim the land as theirs and they both believe that the land belongs to them because it is says that in their religons

Answer:

Correct

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation: no

Answer:

troy hadent been there before

Explanation:

ᴘᴀɴɢʜᴀʟɪᴘ ᴘᴀɴᴀᴏ,ᴘᴀʟᴀɢʏᴏ

Explanation:

sᴛᴜᴅʏ ᴡᴇʟʟ