In the situation wherein Xavier Jones was injured in an accident caused due to another uninsured driver, then the medical expenses of Xavier would be under the cover of the uninsured motorist protection.
The uninsured person may be taken into general understanding as the person who does not hold any insurance against his or her name, and has not subscribed to any insurance policy, with or without payment of insurance premium. The person at loss would not be covered by the uninsured person, but a protection regarding the same is already made to cover the medical outgoes.
Learn more about uninsured here:
https://brainly.com/question/24315960
#SPJ4
Protects against unreasonable searches and seizures is called as?
to those who say flag burning should be illegal despite this evidence, i have a few questions. what exactly would be protected by a law that makes it illegal to burn flags? clothing featuring american flags? fourth of july picnic napkins and plates?
Flag burning in the United States ought to be forbidden and seen as abhorrent.
When Flag Burning Was Illegal?
States didn't start establishing legislation making it unlawful to burn, deface, mutilate, or otherwise disrespect the American flag until the early 20th century. The U.S. Supreme Court began challenging these regulations in 1969, initially by declaring that clauses that forbade verbal disrespect of the flag violated the First Amendment. A few years later, the Court overturned the college student's conviction for hanging an upside-down flag with a peace symbol on it. Then, in 1989, the Supreme Court ruled that burning the flag as part of a political protest qualified as "expressive action" that was protected by the constitution even if no words were used.
To learn more about flag burning visit;
https://brainly.com/question/8992381
#SPJ4
After reviewing Whitehead v. Usa-One, Inc. 595 So. 2d 867 (Ala. 1992), do you believe USA-ONE had a legal duty to protect Whitehead and Prewett from sexual assault or do you agree with the Court? Explain.
The word court comes from the French cour, an enclosed yard, which derives from the Latin form cōrtem, the accusative case of cohors, which again means an enclosed yard or the occupants of such a yard.
What is the meaning of Court?A court, often known as a court of law, is a person or group of people with the power to hear and decide issues involving civil, criminal, ecclesiastical, or military conflicts.
The Latin form crtem, the accusative case of cohors, which again implies an enclosed yard or the tenants of such a yard, is derived from the French word cour, which signifies an enclosed yard.
Learn more about the Court here:
https://brainly.com/question/5684503
#SPJ1
Are the first ten amendments known as the preamble?
The Preamble is the first ten amendments that identify citizens' freedoms. This is a false statement.
The Bill of Rights is the first of the Constitution's ten Amendments. It describes Americans' constitutional rights in regard to their government. It safeguards an individual's civil liberties and rights, such as their right to freedom of expression, of the press, and of religion.
It establishes the fundamentals for due process of law by transferring to the people or the states all the powers not delegated to the federal government. Additionally, the first ten amendments Constitution states that "the enumeration of specific rights in the Constitution must not be construed to be exclusive of or to diminish other rights held by the people."
To learn more about first ten amendments, please refer:
https://brainly.com/question/13163035
#SPJ4
how did the articles of confederation lay the groundwork for america’s future political structure?
The Articles of Confederation laid the groundwork for America’s future political structure by establishing a government with a weak central government and strong state governments.
The Articles also set up a unicameral legislature, or Congress, with limited powers. Finally, the Articles provided for a system of checks and balances that limited the power of the central government and gave the states more control over their own affairs.
These features of the Articles of Confederation would become the basis for the Constitution of the United States and the federal system of government that we have today.
To learn more about Articles of Confederation link is here
brainly.com/question/13608970
#SPJ4
the chief justice of the supreme court who ruled in favor of the cherokee nation was...
John Marshall served as the chief justice of the supreme court and delivered the decision that favored the Cherokee people.
This so-called "Treaty Party" in favor of deportation was led by longtime Cherokee political figure Major Ridge. The bulk of Cherokees opposed to relocation were led by John Ross, the senior chief of the Cherokee people. John Ross served as the principal chief of the Cherokee People for about forty years, during which time the tribe experienced some of its most turbulent times.
He is best known for serving as the Cherokees' chief during the intense factional fighting over the decision to move to Indian Territory in the 1830s (Oklahoma). Georgia, the Cherokee Nation was declared to be sovereign by the US Supreme Court.
Learn more about Cherokee Visit: brainly.com/question/2297390
#SPJ4
Answer:
John Marshall
in order to gain support for his cause, what did governor eugen talmadge argue?
In order to gain support for his cause, Governor Eugene Talmadge of Georgia advocated for white supremacy and segregation.
He was a controversial figure in the mid-20th century. In order to gain support for his cause, Talmadge argued on several points, including:
1. States' Rights: Talmadge believed in the concept of states' rights, which asserted that the federal government should have limited power and that individual states should have more control over their own affairs.
2. Segregation: Talmadge was a staunch supporter of segregation and argued that it was necessary to maintain the social order in the South.
He believed that black people were inferior to whites and that they should be kept separate from white people in all aspects of life, including education, housing, and public accommodations.
3. White Supremacy: Talmadge believed that white people were inherently superior to black people and that it was the duty of white people to maintain their dominance over society.
He argued that black people should not be allowed to hold positions of power or influence and that they should be denied the right to vote.
Overall, Talmadge's arguments were rooted in racism and discrimination, and his views were widely condemned by civil rights activists and other progressive voices of his time.
To know more about Governor Eugene Talmadge here:
https://brainly.com/question/14418703
#SPJ4
who announces the president at the state of the union
The House of Representatives Sergeant-at-Arms announces the President's arrival. The President is then introduced and goes on to address the Congress.
It is customary for one member of the president's cabinet to skip the State of the Union speech.
Near the start of most calendar years, the president of the United States addresses a joint session of Congress with his annual message on the state of the union, also known as the State of the Union Address (SOTU).
The State of the Union Address typically includes updates on the nation's finances, economy, news, agenda, advancements, as well as the president's legislative priorities and agenda items.
Learn more about " state of the union " to visit here;
https://brainly.com/question/14372354
#SPJ4
In general, progressives differed from labor and farm advocates because the progressives were mostly middle class urban reformers. True/False?
The given statement "In general, progressives differed from labor and farm advocates because the progressives were mostly middle-class urban reformers" is true.
Progressives were a diverse group of reformers who were primarily middle-class urbanites. They sought to address the social and economic problems caused by rapid industrialization and urbanization during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
Many progressives believed that the government could and should play a more active role in regulating the economy and society, and they advocated for a variety of reforms, such as workers' rights, women's suffrage, and government regulation of big business.
In contrast, labor advocates and farm advocates were generally focused on more specific issues affecting their respective groups. Labor advocates, for example, focused on improving working conditions and wages for industrial workers, while farm advocates sought to address the economic challenges faced by farmers.
While there was some overlap between these groups and the progressive movement, the progressives tended to take a broader view of the issues facing American society and were less narrowly focused on specific interest groups.
To know more about middle-class urban reformers here:
https://brainly.com/question/30708982
#SPJ4
Huey long criticized roosevelt’s new deal policies because he believed.
Huey Long disagreed with Roosevelt's New Deal initiatives because he thought more extreme measures were required to alleviate poverty.
What can be done to alleviate poverty?
Applications for economic protection, together with those for social protection, food assistance, tax credits, and housing assistance, can help create opportunity by reducing short-term poverty and hardship and, in doing so, enhancing children's long-term outcomes.
Each year, the government allots a budget to each faculty to cover its regular expenses, which include books, maintenance, stationery, and strength. Compared to academic institutions that are permitted to set their own prices, no-price colleges receive greater money.
With the help of its strategy, the Philippine government hopes to end extreme poverty by 2040. Additionally, the government has implemented a number of policies and reforms to reduce poverty by focusing on the financial system as a whole, healthcare, and education.
The social security system is one of the main government policies to address extreme poverty levels. The government's primary strategy for reducing poverty is social safety programs, while secondary initiatives include free or heavily discounted housing and vital services.
To learn more about alleviating poverty visit;
https://brainly.com/question/14285856
#SPJ4
In what situations does the ucc overrule common law?
The UCC overrules common law as UCC applies to contracts that sell goods.
What benefit does the UCC provide?
The ability to receive payment is enhanced by a UCC filing, which establishes you as a secured creditor. The first right to reclaim your inventory or technology in the event of failure or bankruptcy is also provided by the filing of a promissory note security interest.
Common law is superseded by the UCC when it comes to contracts for the sale of goods. Contractual agreements involving physical assets like real land, services, insurance, and employment are governed by common law.
Therefore, The UCC governs agreements for the trade of commodities, and legal systems are superseded by it.
Learn more about UCC from the given link.
https://brainly.com/question/13640672
#SPJ1
what is the controversial policy enforced by the EEOC that seeks to remedy past discrimination?
The policy regarding the inclusion of affirmative actions was a controversial policy enforced by the EEOC that sought to remedy past the practice of discrimination.
The policy of affirmative action had been brought into enforcement into the American society with an intention to provide remedial relief to the individuals who face discrimination in the society based on the different grounds. Ever since its enforcement by the EEOC, it became controversial, as many southern states had been in opposition of the same.
Learn more about affirmative action here:
https://brainly.com/question/8088645
#SPJ4
why did governor eugene talmadge strongly oppose president franklin d. roosevelt’s new deal programs?
Governor Eugene Talmadge strongly opposed President Franklin D. Roosevelt's new arrangement programs. They did not provide aid to farmers and they would reduce executive power. option (A) and (B) is correct.
Lead representative Eugene Talmadge firmly went against President Franklin D. Roosevelt's new arrangement during the 1930s. Around then President Roosevelt held the New Arrangement with a program to recruit different jobless individuals to work in different public areas.
This program left ranch proprietors with a lack of laborers since they liked to work in the program. The ranch proprietors whined to Lead representative Talmage which made him went against the New Arrangement.
Learn more about American history:
https://brainly.com/question/1874247
#SPJ4
This question is not complete, Here I am attaching the complete question:
Why did Governor Eugene Talmadge strongly oppose President Franklin D. Roosevelt's new deal programs? Select two.
(A) They did not provide aid to farmers.
(B) They would reduce executive power.
(C) They provided aid to African Americans.
what did passage of the seventeenth amendment entail?
The passage of the seventeenth amendment entails the election of U.S. senators by popular votes.
The seventeenth amendment of the U.S. Constitution establishes the direct election of the United State senators for each state. The 17th amendment supersedes Article I, Section 3, Clauses 1 and 2 of the Constitution, under which senators of the states were elected by state legislatures. It also alters the procedure for filling vacancies in the Senate, allowing for state legislatures to permit their governors to make temporary appointments until a special election can be held. The amendment was proposed by the 62nd congress in the year 1912 and it became the part of the constitution on 1913, April 8 on ratification by three quarters of the state legislatures.
To know more about "seventeenth amendment" visit-
brainly.com/question/8813331
#SPJ4
what are the limitations of health and safety legislation in any workplace nebosh diploma
Answer:
Legislative restrictions on health and safety:
The legislation governing health and safety does not always clearly define legal rights and obligations; in some cases, only general guidelines must be followed.
Managers must act appropriately and urgently.Although employees have a right to a safe workplace, they also have an obligation to take reasonable safety precautions for themselves.
The law serves more as a general framework than as specific guidelines when it comes to health and safety; it also depends on morality and common sense.
in virginia, it is illegal to drive on the left side of the road for passing purposes when
Answer: The driver of a vehicle shall not drive to the left side of the center line of a highway in overtaking and passing another vehicle proceeding in the same direction unless the such left side is clearly visible and is free of oncoming traffic for a sufficient distance ahead to permit such overtaking and passing to be made safely.
Explanation: This Virginia law took effect on July 1, 2017. Under the law, when drivers remain in the left lane, they can face a fine of $100. The law is designed to facilitate traffic flow and prevent accidents.
In Virginia, it is illegal to drive on the left side of the road for passing purposes when there is a solid yellow line on your side of the road. I will show you others.
When is it illegal to drive on the left side of the road?When there is a solid yellow line on your side of the road.When there is a no passing signal.When there is oncoming traffic.When you are approaching the top of a hill or a curve where you cannot see oncoming traffic.It is important to always follow the rules of the road in Virginia in order to keep yourself and others safe while driving. Passing on the left side of the road when it is illegal to do so can result in:
A ticket.Points on your license. Potentially an accident.Remember to always check for solid yellow lines, no passing signs, oncoming traffic, and limited visibility before attempting to pass on the left side of the road.
Another question about Virginia in https://brainly.com/question/410489
#SPJ11
According to Chapter 9 of americas courts and the criminal justice system, what inroads has the victims’ rights movement made regarding changes in the criminal justice system and process? Victim assistance and victim compensation programs are well established in many jurisdictions, but are they enough to compensate victims for their losses?
According to Chapter 9 of "America's Courts and the Criminal Justice System," the victims' rights movement has made significant inroads in terms of changes in the criminal justice system and process. One of the key changes brought about by the victims' rights movement is the recognition of the rights of crime victims, including the right to be informed about their case, the right to be heard in court, and the right to receive protection from further harm.
Victim assistance and victim compensation programs have been established in many jurisdictions to help compensate victims for their losses. These programs provide financial and other support to crime victims to help them recover from the emotional and financial toll of crime. However, these programs are not always enough to fully compensate victims for their losses.
In some cases, victims may still face significant financial losses, including lost wages, medical expenses, and property damage. Furthermore, the emotional toll of crime can be long-lasting and difficult to quantify, making it difficult to compensate victims for their losses.
Despite these challenges, the victims' rights movement has made important progress in recognizing the rights and needs of crime victims and in providing support and compensation to help them recover from the impact of crime. However, much work remains to be done to ensure that all crime victims are adequately compensated for their losses and that the criminal justice system is fully responsive to the needs of victims.
as a provision of the land ordinance of 1785, (1) one lot in each township was set aside for a _____________.
As a provision of the Land Ordinance of 1785, (1) one lot in each township was set aside for a public school. This was done in order to promote education and ensure that each township had access to a school for its residents.
What is the Land Ordinance of 1785?The Land Ordinance of 1785 was an important piece of legislation that helped to organize the settlement and development of the Northwest Territory.
It established a system for surveying and dividing the land into townships, and set aside one lot in each township for the purpose of building a public school.
This provision helped to promote education and ensure that each township had access to a school for its residents.
Learn More about Land Ordinance of 1785 at https://brainly.com/question/30082465
#SPJ11
As a provision of the Land Ordinance of 1785, one lot in each township was set aside for a public school.
This was done to ensure that education was a priority in the newly formed townships and that there was land specifically designated for this purpose.
¿What is the Land Ordinance Law of 1785?The Land Ordinance of 1785 was a law passed by the United States Congress that outlined the process for dividing and selling land in the Northwest Territory.
It created a system of townships, each consisting of 36 square miles, and further divided each township into 36 one-square-mile sections.
One of these sections was set aside for the purpose of building a public school, demonstrating the importance of education in the newly formed townships.
Another question about Law in https://brainly.com/question/20585839
#SPJ11
Privatized prisons may be more likely to experience assaults between prisoners and guards and/or jailbreaks
because
0 prison quards in these settings may not have been properly trained
. the private guards employed in these facilities have no arrest or detention authority
O inadequate spending to increase profits
may mean conditions in the facility are sub-standard
O they are not accredited in the same way that government-run facilities are
Inadequate spending to increase profits may be the primary reason why privatized prisons may be more likely to experience assaults between prisoners and guards and/or jailbreaks. This is because these facilities may not have the necessary funds to hire properly trained guards and provide the necessary resources to maintain the facility to a standard comparable to government-run facilities. Additionally, the private guards employed in these facilities have no arrest or detention authority, meaning they may not be able to adequately respond to any incidents that may occur.
T or F: The lands and grooves of a barrel's rifling improve the accuracy of a bullet
The lands and grooves of a rifling barrel are really helpful in improving the accuracy levels of the bullets by a greater margin more often than not. Therefore, the given statement is to be held as true.
It is very much appropriate to be mentioning about the accuracy of a barrel to depend upon the rifling and lands and grooves for a précised bullet being fired from a rifle. The caliber of the gun is the most indispensable part that determines the accuracy of any gun over a prolonged period of time.
Learn more about accuracy here:
https://brainly.com/question/29466313
#SPJ4
Who was the designated survivor for the State of the Union?
Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg was the selected survivor for the 2021 State of the Union address.
To guarantee the continuation of government in the event of a catastrophic occurrence, the designated survivor is a member of the president's cabinet who is not present during the State of the Union speech.
The president's cabinet member who is not a member of the president's political party is often chosen to be the designated survivor. The chosen survivor is brought to a secret location, where they stay until the conclusion of the address.
To learn more about catastrophic event link is here
brainly.com/question/30634248
#SPJ4
As a driver you have a responsibility to pedestrians that is:
a. Legal
b. Moral
c. Both A and B are correct
d. Neither A nor B is correct
Answer:
As a driver, you have a responsibility to pedestrians that is both legal and moral.
Drivers have a legal obligation to operate their vehicles in a safe manner and to abide by traffic laws, including laws that protect pedestrians. They also have a moral obligation to take into account the safety and well-being of others, including pedestrians, when operating a vehicle.
Therefore, the correct answer is "c. Both A and B are correct."
Explanation:
does a misdemeanor disqualify you from the military
Yes, a misdemeanor can disqualify you from the military.
Misdemeanor is a wrong done by a person, a crime that is not very serious in nature. Punishment provided under such acts are also very minimal such as penalty or fines. These crimes are civil in nature and doesn't involve any injury or harm to human life. A person could face an involuntary administrative discharge based on a civilian conviction, or other civilian court outcome that is considered to be conviction. And military career could be ended by a civilian criminal conviction even if it is only a misdemeanor. It can be used as measure to judge a person behavior in public which can affects a person's carrier in military.
To know more about "misdemeanor" visit-
brainly.com/question/30175834
#SPJ4
the following is information that should be taken into consideration when making suitable recommendations concerning the purchase of insurance, except:
Out of the choices of alternatives provided above, it may be stated that education is the factor that should not be taken into consideration wherein there is a need of making suitable and apt recommendations related to the insurance policies being purchased. Therefore, the option D holds true.
Education is the aspect that does not concern the insurance being purchased by an individual. Also, it is also to be stated that the individuals having more or less education do not have an influence over the price of the premium of the insurance, and hence, are best not taken into consideration.
Learn more about insurance here:
https://brainly.com/question/27822778
#SPJ4
The following is information that should be taken into consideration when making suitable recommendations concerning the purchase of insurance, EXCEPT:
a. financial time horizon
b. annual income
c. tax status
d. education
Suppose you are trying to decide whether to invest in a company that generates a high expected ROE, and you want to conduct further analysis on the company’s performance. If you wanted to conduct a trend analysis, you would:
a) Compare the firm’s financial ratios with other firms in the industry for a particular year
OR
b) Analyze the firm’s financial ratios over time
According to your understanding, a company with one key product is considered to be ___________ risky than companies with a wide range of products.
a) more
OR
b) less
According to your understanding, company with one key product is considered to be riskier than the companies with wide range of products.
What is a company?A company is a business organization that is engaged in various economic activities, such as production, distribution, and marketing of goods and services. It is established with a specific purpose, mission, and vision to achieve certain goals and objectives. A company can be of different types, including sole proprietorship, partnership, limited liability company, or corporation, and can operate in various sectors, including manufacturing, finance, healthcare, retail, or technology. A company has a legal entity, separate from its owners, and can enter into contracts, borrow funds, own property, and sue or be sued. It has a board of directors, management team, and employees who work together to achieve the company's goals and create value for its stakeholders, including shareholders, customers, employees, and society.
To learn more about society, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/16938919
#SPJ1
For many years, there have been limits set on the amount of sugar that foreign producers can sell in the U.S. market. This is mandated by a?options:a. net profit.b. tariff rate quota system.c. trade surplus.d. subsidy agreement.e. quota share
For many years, there have been limits set on the amount of sugar that foreign producers can sell in the U.S. market. This is mandated by the tariff rate quota system.
What is the tariff rate quota system?
A tariff-rate quota (TRQ), often known as a tariff quota, is a two-tiered tariff system used to control imports of goods. It combines import quotas with tariffs.
A TRQ demands a higher tariff rate for imports of a certain product in excess of a certain quantity while allowing a lower tariff rate for imports of that product within a certain number. As an illustration, a nation might permit the entry of 5,000 tractors at a 10% tariff rate. However, a 30% tariff would apply to any tractors imported in excess of this amount.
A TRQ scheme does not limit the number of imported goods, in contrast to a straightforward quota system. An "out-of-quota commitment" is added to the "in-quota commitment."
To learn more about tariff rate quota system visit;
https://brainly.com/question/29034025
#SPJ4
can someone put a lien on my house without me knowing
Yes, the court in specific conditions can put a lien on a private property.
Lien is the right over another persons property to keep in possession in exchange of debt generated until the debt is paid. Lien is placed on a private property to escape from the risk of fraud or default in payment of the loan credited to the owner of the property by the lien holder. The court may consider reason stated by the plaintiff to put a lien over a property. And in cases when the debt is not repaid the creditors can sell the mortgaged property in order to fulfill their loss. Therefore, lien can be involuntary.
To know more about "lien" visit-
brainly.com/question/30118274
#SPJ4
During the defendant's cross-country road trip, he was involved in a car accident with the plaintiff in the state where the plaintiff lived. Following the accident, the plaintiff sued the defendant in federal court located in the state where the accident occurred. Prior to the accident, the defendant had never been to the forum state. The defendant flew home from the forum state directly following the accident, and has not been back to the forum state since that time. Before filing a responsive pleading, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the court lacked personal jurisdiction. The court denied the defendant's motion.What is the most likely basis for the exercise of jurisdiction over the defendant in this case?
A
General jurisdiction.
B
In rem jurisdiction.
C
Quasi in rem jurisdiction.
D
Specific jurisdiction.
The correct option is Option D - Specific jurisdiction.
Based on the facts presented, the most likely basis for the exercise of jurisdiction over the defendant in this case is specific jurisdiction.
Specific jurisdiction is a legal remedy in contract law in which a court requires a party to satisfy the terms of a contract rather than paying monetary damages for a breach of contract. This remedy is generally available in circumstances when monetary damages would be insufficient to recompense the injured party, frequently because the contract's subject matter is unique or has exceptional value.
The defendant was involved in a car accident with the plaintiff in the plaintiff's home state, giving rise to the cause of action. Despite the fact that the defendant had never visited the forum state, the act of driving in the state and being involved in an accident there constitutes a sufficient relationship with the forum state to enable the exercise of particular jurisdiction over the defendant.
For such more question on jurisdiction:
https://brainly.com/question/26659100
#SPJ4
True or False statement, when congress wants to regulate an issue, it most often passes very detailed regulations so that there are no questions about its intent.
The given attestation " when congress wants to regulate an issue, it most often passes very detailed regulations so that there are no questions about its intent". is False because
At the point when congress needs to control an issue, it most frequently passes extremely definite guidelines with the goal that there are no inquiries concerning its aim.
A administrative agency depicted about that framed by empowering regulation likewise gives the position to lay out guidelines that will authorize and carry out the law. A bill doesn't become regulation until it is passed by the lawmaking body and endorsed by the chief.
Statute is another word that is utilized reciprocally with regulation. Regulations are otherwise called Demonstrations of Congress. Exactly when a bill is passed in unclear construction by both the Senate and the House.
Learn more about congress regulation:
https://brainly.com/question/12921514
#SPJ4
Why do you think the Strategic Defense Initiative was controversial?
Answer: The Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) was controversial because it suggested the potential for the United States to develop a space-based missile defense system. This system would have been capable of shooting down ballistic missiles, potentially giving the US an incredibly powerful advantage in nuclear warfare. The concern was that such a system could lead to an arms race, as other countries would feel the need to develop their own missile defense systems in order to compete on a level playing field. Additionally, the cost of developing such a system was seen as prohibitively expensive, as well as potentially leading to a destabilization of the balance of power.
Explanation: The choice of words in the paragraph was meant to emphasize the potential consequences of the Strategic Defense Initiative. By describing the system as "potentially giving the US an incredibly powerful advantage in nuclear warfare" and as "potentially leading to an arms race," it highlights the potential risks of developing such a system. By mentioning the cost of developing such a system and the potential for destabilization of the balance of power, it further emphasizes the potential dangers of the SDI.
Answer:
The Strategic Defense Initiative, also known as "Star Wars," was a controversial program proposed by U.S. President Ronald Reagan in the 1980s. The program aimed to develop a system of space-based missiles and lasers to protect the U.S. from incoming enemy missiles.
There were several reasons why the Strategic Defense Initiative was controversial:
Cost: The program was expected to be extremely expensive, and many people believed that the funds would be better spent on other programs such as education, healthcare, and social security.
Effectiveness: There were questions about the feasibility and reliability of the technology proposed for the program, and many experts believed that a missile defense system would not be effective in stopping a large-scale attack.
Arms race: The Strategic Defense Initiative was seen by some as an attempt by the U.S. to gain a military advantage over the Soviet Union, which would lead to an arms race and increase tensions between the two countries.
International opposition: The program was widely opposed by many countries around the world, who saw it as a threat to global stability and a potential trigger for a new arms race.
Ethical and legal concerns: Some people believed that the development and deployment of a missile defense system would violate international laws and treaties, and raise ethical concerns about the use of space for military purposes.
Explanation:
These and other factors made the Strategic Defense Initiative a highly controversial program that sparked intense debate and opposition both in the U.S. and internationally.
just tell me if you kinda confuse
ALLEN
