Answer:
Explanation:
Plantilla de contrato de gestión del talento
Plantilla de contrato de gestión del talento - Plantilla de contrato de gestión del talento,
what is change management
Documenting what changes have been made to a program and what changes are needed
How are the governments of Athens and the US the same?
Answer:
The Athenian state was actually a direct democracy while the US is a representative democracy. Citizens are allowed to vote in both states, and both also have a bicameral legislature.
hope it helps
mark me brainliest pls
Anybody good at social studies that can help me
Cause I need help ASAP
Cause I could use that help
Discuss the difference between Old regionalism and New regionalism
Answer:
New regionalism gave rise to regional organizations that had a wide-ranging set of stated policy objectives. ... Unlike old regionalism, which was oriented more toward interactions between states, new regionalism involved a variety of state and nonstate actors involved in a process of transformation of the world order.
Explanation:
What does the diagram show about Earth’s interior?
A.The outer core is the hottest region.
B.The mantle is hotter than the outer core.
C.The continental crust is the coolest region.
D.The inner core is cooler than the lithosphere
who ever responds fast they will get brainlist
[tex]▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ { \huge \mathfrak{Answer}}▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ [/tex]
The Correct choice is :
The continental crust is the coolest region.
MARKING AS BRAINLIEST!! ( VALLEY FORGE, one reason why you would quit the army ?
Which of the following is NOT a cause or effect of the rock cycle?
A.weathering, erosion, and deposition
B.hurricanes, tornadoes, and thunderstorms
C.mountain building, volcanoes, and rift zones
D.plate tectonics, continental drift, and earthquakes
Answer:
C.mountain building, volcanoes, and rift zones
Explanation:
None of these things are causes of effects
The chart compares how men and women voted in
presidential elections from 1972 to 2012.
-This chart demonstrates that
-men and women are more likely to support democratic candidates going forward.
-women and men were equal in their support of democratic candidates.
- men were more likely to support democratic candidates than women.
-women were more likely to support democratic candidates than men.
From the chart, we can see that from 1972 onwards, women were more likely to support democratic candidates than men.
The chart shows that since 1972, women have increasingly voted for the Democratic party and even though their support fluctuates, it still remains quite high such that over 50% of women have voted for the Democrats since 1996.
The most probable reason for this is that:
The Democrats are more liberal and so support women's rights The Democrats has very powerful female politiciansMen on the other hand, have maintained a general level of support for the Democrats but less than 50% of men have voted Democrat since 1972.
In conclusion, the chart shows that since 1972, women were more likely to vote Democrat than men would.
Find out more at https://brainly.com/question/1168260.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
edg 2022
SOmeone help me please i need to finish this
Answer:
troy hadent been there before
Explanation:
How does indexing compensate for inflation over time?
your answer should be - changed in the overall price level in an economy over time.
Hope that helps
sdsscivil techonology
Smith wrote about this event 15 years after it happened. Do you think he remembered it exactly happened and why?
Answer: Yes, because he wrote about his event
What is the law of conservation of mass?
Answer:The Law of Conservation of Mass dates from Antoine Lavoisier's 1789 discovery that mass is neither created nor destroyed in chemical reactions.
Answer: The Law of Conservation of Mass dates from Antoine Lavoisier's 1789 discovery that mass is neither created nor destroyed in chemical reactions. ... If we account for all reactants and products in a chemical reaction, the total mass will be the same at any point in time in any closed system.
A) what is the law of conservation of mass?
Law of conservation of mass:
According to the law of conservation mass, mass can neither be created nor destroyed in a chemical equation it changed from one to another form.
B) what is an every day example of the law of conservation of mass?
Burning of wood:
When wood is burn it converted into ashes, soot and gases. The mass of all these are equal to the mass of reactants i.e, oxygen and charcoal.
C) how do we see the law of conservation of mass everyday?
Burning of candle:
When candle is burn the mass of wax and oxygen is equal to the product which are carbon dioxide and water. Thus burning of candle also follow the law of conservation of mass.
Burning of wood:
When wood is burn it converted into ashes, soot and gases. The mass of all these are equal to the mass of reactants i.e, oxygen and charcoal.
D) who proposed the theory of the law of conservation of mass?
This law was given by french chemist Antoine Lavoisier in 1789. According to this law mass of reactant and mass of product must be equal, because masses are not created or destroyed in a chemical reaction.
Explanation:
who wants me to teach you Spanish?
To keep him from exalting himself, God gave him a thorn in the flesh. true or False
Answer:
Correct
Explanation:
So, do you think the experiences of Chinese immigrants we learned about in this video are similar or different to immigrant experience today? Why?
Answer:
Explanation: no
What is the capital of Mexico?
Answer:
Mexico City is the answer
What role did books/print material play in your learning?
Explain which region you would have liked to live in during the Second Industrial Revolution and why. (North, South, West, or Midwest.)
Answer:
Explanation: midwest
Why did farming force humans to fight one another
Answer:
whyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
Both Jews and Arab Muslims have a strong religious connection to the land in Palestine (Israel).
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
they have been in war for years trying to claim the land as theirs and they both believe that the land belongs to them because it is says that in their religons
a) Identify the constitutional clause that is common to both Shaw v. Reno and Easley v. Cromartie.
b) Based on the constitutional clause identified in part A, explain why the facts elucidated in Easley v. Cromartie might have led to a different holding than the holding in Shaw v. Reno.
c) Describe an action that members of the public who disagree with the holding in Easley v. Cromartie could take to limit its impact.
Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.
Answer: A.) Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act. While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings. Its goal is to impose significantly more constitutional limitations on the states than existed prior to the Civil War. Therefore, the Supreme Court ruled in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), that racial redistricting must be subject to strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause and that the bodies responsible for redistricting must be aware of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act. While the Supreme Court found that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in defining the 1997 borders was based on patently false conclusions in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001).
B.) Easley filed an appeal with the US Supreme Court in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, challenging the ruling in Hunt v. Cromartie. In the case of Hunt v. Cromartie, the court determined that the North Carolina legislature did not consider race when establishing the borders of the twelfth congressional district in 1992. The court ruled that there was no proof that the legislature had violated the equal protection article of the constitution or that it had drawn boundaries based on race rather than politics. In Easley v Cromartie the argument was that establishing the borders for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The United States Supreme Court ruled that the lower court's ruling was incorrect because it genuinely relied on racial issues, which is against the interests of the state. In Shaw v. Reno, the court found that North Carolina's voting strategy attempted to separate voters based on race.
c.) I think that a move that members of this court would disagree with the BLM (Black lives Matter) movement. This case, Easley v Cromartie has severe relations to the equal protection clause. This clause states, "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." This clause when then debunked when later furthering the case, which is almost exactly what the BLM movement was about. Both cases disagreed with the equality of particular groups of people.
Explanation: just submitted
What are five qualities or characteristics of the American Culture?
Answer:
independence, Privacy, Equality, Achievement, Timeliness
Explanation:
Correct Me if I'm wrong, Hope this helps! :)
Anybody a expert or really good at social studies cuz I really need that help answer ASAP
Answer:
I am ...............................
Answer:i am good a social studies why whats the question
Explanation:
A. Suriin kung anong panghalip panao na ginagamit sa pangungusap.
1. Sila ay magsisimba.
2. Hiniwa niya ang tiyan ng manok.
3. Ako ay mag-aaral sa Tiptip ng Elementarya.
4. Ikaw ay kasama ko.
ᴘᴀɴɢʜᴀʟɪᴘ ᴘᴀɴᴀᴏ,ᴘᴀʟᴀɢʏᴏ
Explanation:
sᴛᴜᴅʏ ᴡᴇʟʟ
what should be done to make foreign employment well managed by government host country and employees?
Answer:
47
Explanation:
why people living in southwest Asia might prefer to work in a city located by a river
Answer: graegaehagggd
Explanation:
Political differences between Haddad and Bolsonaro can most accurately be compared to the difference between
a. Socialism and Marxism
b. Fascism and Super-Fascism
c. Democrat and Totalitarian
d. Liberal and Centrist
In case of liquidation of fixed assets that are still of use value and cash collection, the following accounts shall be recorded: A. Decrease in cost and increase in depreciation
B. Increase costs, decrease income; C. Increase income, reduce costs.
D. Increase costs, increase income
When there is the liquidation of fixed assets that are of use-value with cash collection, the accounts recorded are as follows C. Increase income, reduce costs.
The income increases because of the cash collection from the liquidation. The fixed assets' accounts are credited (reduced) with the costs.
Then debit the accumulated depreciation account with the amount of its balance. A new account called the "Sale of Fixed Assets" account opens.
The "Sale of Fixed Assets" account is debited with the costs and credited with the accumulated depreciation and the cash proceeds from the disposal.
Thus, the difference is an increase in income (profit) if the credit side exceeds the debit side of the "Sale of Fixed Assets" account.
Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/21143131
someone to talk?!.............❤️☺️!!
Answer:
Hiiiiiii!!! :)))
Explanation:
How are you?
Answer:
hiiiiii hru wyd
Explanation:
